I feel like this is an appropriate reaction image for anything and everything.
Rules: Just insert your answers to the questions below. Tag at least 10 followers
Nickname: Taliban Bunny
Birthday: 4/10 (or 10/4)
Sexuality: Glorious cis hetero master race
Time Zone: Mountain (YEEAAAHHH!)
What time and date is it there: 1237, 26/08/2013
Average hours of sleep I get each night: 6
The last thing I Googled was: Five Nights at Freddy’s
My most used phrase(s): "That has got to be the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard."
First word that comes to mind: Swiggity swooty, I’m comin’ for that booty.
What I last said to a family member: Asking my dad for peoples’ addresses
One place that makes me happy & why: America because I can literally walk anywhere and feel like I’m better than everyone around me.
How many blankets I sleep under: 2
Favourite beverage(s): Killian’s Irish Red
The last movie I watched in the cinema: Ninja Turtles
Three things I can’t live without: Vidya, pizza, beer
Something I plan on learning: How to shoot people in the face for realzies.
A piece of advice for all my followers: Never trust a bureaucrat who makes you a promise. He definitely has no intention of keeping it.
You all have to listen to this song: The fuckin’ soundtrack to RRRRWWWWWWWWWWWWWBY, man.
My blog(s): Teabee’s Adventures in FabulosityI tag: No one because I have no tumblrista friends.
ileolai asked: you know actual soldiers in the actual military have been talking about how over-militarized the ferguson police are, right? people who have experience in these matters, unlike you?
They might be right. That said, the military is a big place full of diverse people with diverse opinions. That’s what makes it so great. My knowledge probably isn’t as in-depth as, say, my fellow soldiers who have deployed and have extensive knowledge of the black arts of shooting, moving, and communicating. However from my perspective, that of a medic in an infantry unit, talking about over-militarization strikes me as paranoid when the examples cited are things that have no bearing on the situation (camouflage uniforms, protective gear), or are readily available in the civilian world (M-4’s and the equivalent). A lot of this stuff sounds scarier than it actually is. Now, if we’re talking about drones and other high-power surveillance technologies, now THAT is something people should be worried about - and a lot of advances in that field are being made outside the military.
Military does not automatically equal “more powerful” or “more efficient at killing”.
So apparently, police using “military”-style gear in Ferguson sounds pretty scary. I googled around for some examples of what they were talking about.
Camouflage pants: Oooh, uniforms are totally scary. Especially when they are of a pattern suited for blending into forest environments. In a city. Police totally overreaching here.
Night vision optics, gas masks: They help you see in the dark and keep you from choking on your own tear gas. Sounds like pretty standard riot gear to me. The same effect could be achieved with giant floodlights but that sounds like something right out of 1984 and people would get spooked out in a completely different way. Also, need lots of wiring. Easier to power night vision (AA batteries).
Gas masks look scary too. I get it. I played Wolfenstein too when I was a kid.
Extra magazines: If this doesn’t strike you as common sense you have either spent too much time playing FPSes, never used a gun in your life, or both. A lot of civilian gun owners carry extra magazines just in case. When they do it nobody cares. When the police do it, scaaary.
Body armor: Oh come on seriously? Body armor and kneepads equate to some kind of militarized police death squad? To me, they equate to not getting hurt by gunfire or random mishaps. I actually heard anecdotal evidence that the police at Ferguson were wearing more body armor than soldiers deployed overseas. That may be true, but it’s also irrelevant. Combat and riot policing are two different kinds of work. I don’t know much about combat, but I think I would rather wear more armor if I was in an enclosed space and the greatest threat was from gunfire rather than roadside bombs. Of course, if we’re talking about protesters throwing molotov cocktails, I’d probably not want to wear any body armor at all; maybe a flame-resistant jumpsuit. Shit’s uncomfortable.
Military rifles: Rifles based on the M-4 Carbine, apparently. You know what else is based on the M-4? The AR-15, available to almost anyone with a clean background and $800, give or take. There is nothing special or more powerful about military rifles compared to civilian rifles. The case could be argued that using rifles instead of, say, pistols, was excessive force but honestly, I wouldn’t start getting scared until they start busting out the M249’s (light machine gun) and M240B’s (medium machine gun).
MRAPs: Really big trucks. I guess they’re scary to look at. Do they do anything that big police trucks don’t do? Not really.
Nonlethal sonic weapons: Okay, so they’re complaining that using a non-lethal sonic weapon designed for riot suppression without killing targets is excessive force? That doesn’t really make sense.
Not that I’m a fan of the Ferguson police or anything, I just happen to have pierced the veil of mystique surrounding tactical gear, which is fetishized to an unhealthy extent by civilians, and am allergic to rampant paranoia. Stop and take some time to think about stuff; the truth is often rather mundane.
100 notes is all it takes.
Yes please ^_^.
Uh oh… Better get ready for Freddy.
I forgot Emilie Autumn was a thing she is practically my waifu…I guess.